Retail CFOs often view the cost of cash through a narrow, bank-centric lens: deposit fees, Cash In Transit pickups and lodging charges that appear neatly on monthly statements. This is understandable, as these are the numbers that are easiest to see. But they’re also the smallest part of the real cost. The majority of expense sits inside the store itself, buried in labour time, error rates, reconciliation routines, and the operational drag created by manual processes.
In truth, bank fees are not the cost of cash. Manual handling is.
Across Europe and the UK, retailers routinely underestimate how cash affects their bottom line because the most expensive components don’t show up as “cash costs” in financial reporting. A retailer can easily compare cash handling charges from PNB Bank, Canara Bank or any other provider, and these figures often become the focus of financial planning. But this visibility can mask the bigger picture. What retailers can’t see -unless they measure it – is how much they lose when a cashier spends ten minutes resolving a discrepancy, when a manager must leave the shop floor to complete a safe drop, or when a manual cash-back request creates friction at the till. These hidden costs accumulate silently. In most retailers, labour accounts for 70–80% of the true cost of cash. Bank fees rarely represent more than a small fraction of that.
The shift in customer behaviour adds another dimension. With ATMs disappearing from high streets, more customers now withdraw cash directly from retail counters. While this increases footfall, it also increases strain on staff when everything is handled manually. What looks like a simple service, handing over a few notes, quickly becomes a queue delay, a reconciliation risk, and a repeated time drain across an entire trading day.
This is exactly where automation changes the economics.
Recyclers such as JCM’s MRX and Ultra remove the labour component that makes cash appear expensive. They validate and store notes instantly, eliminating counting, re-counting and manual error resolution. But equally important are the lifecycle and availability benefits that automation brings. Both MRX and Ultra are engineered for a lifecycle of around one million notes, meaning they remain dependable for far longer than typical retail cash devices. Their higher availability results in fewer service calls, fewer breakdowns and far fewer operational disruptions – a critical advantage during peak trading periods such as Christmas, when any downtime directly impacts revenue and customer service.
With automated cash-back, reconciliation becomes an auditable function rather than a manual burden. Managers no longer spend evenings correcting end-of-day discrepancies. Cashiers are freed to serve customers instead of handling loose notes. And shrinkage declines sharply because the machine performs consistently; even during the busiest shifts when human error naturally increases.
Once retailers model the numbers accurately, a clear pattern emerges: the moment labour time is removed, cash stops being the costly payment type it is often assumed to be. Stress points vanish, staff efficiency rises, and the cost curve bends downward. Automation flips the equation.
This matters because cash is not disappearing – even in highly digital markets. It remains essential for financial inclusion, reliable payment during system outages, and simple customer choice. The goal should not be to eliminate cash, but to eliminate the inefficiencies that once made cash difficult to manage.
By automating cash-in and cash-out, retailers keep the payment method but lose the burden. They replace friction with flow, uncertainty with control, and manual hours with machine-led accuracy. The conclusion is simple:
Cash isn’t expensive; manual cash is. And with automation, retailers finally have the tools to change the maths in their favour.
Deutsch
Español